中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 不同小蠹类与天牛类引诱剂联用对蛀干甲虫的林间诱捕效果(英文) 昆虫学报 2013,56 (4) 452-456
Position: Home > Articles > Field efficacy of combinations of attractants for bark beetles and longicorn beetles in trapping wood-boring beetles Acta Entomologica Sinica 2013,56 (4) 452-456

不同小蠹类与天牛类引诱剂联用对蛀干甲虫的林间诱捕效果(英文)

作  者：
王义平;郭瑞;邓建宇;张真
单  位：
浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院;浙江清凉峰国家级自然保护区管理局;中国林业科学研究院森林环境与保护研究所
关键词：
松墨天牛;小蠹虫;引诱剂;诱捕;蛀干甲虫
摘  要：
松墨天牛Monochamusaltern atusHope是传播松材线虫病的主要媒介,引诱剂是抑制松墨天牛种群数量的无公害调控有效方式之一。本研究通过在中国浙江富阳的林间试验测定了6种小蠹类引诱剂与1种天牛引诱剂不同组合联用对松墨天牛成虫以及其他蛀干害虫的诱捕效果。结果表明:横坑切梢小蠹Tomicus minor引诱剂3-carene-10-ol、云杉八齿小蠹Ips typographus引诱剂2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol、欧洲榆小蠹Scolytus multistriatus引诱剂4-methyl-3-heptanol和纵坑切梢小蠹T.piniperda引诱剂verbenol分别与松墨天牛引诱剂联用后,对松墨天牛的引诱效果无显著性差异(P<0.05)。西部松大小蠹Dendroctonus brevicomis引诱剂exo-brevicomin或黄杉大小蠹D.pseudotsugae引诱剂1-methylcyclohex-2-en-l-ol与松墨天牛引诱剂联用后对松墨天牛的诱捕效果有减弱的趋势。另外,与单独使用中国天牛引诱剂相比,小蠹类引诱剂与其联用后在诱捕其他蛀干害虫的种类和个体数量上均有所减少。
译  名：
Field efficacy of combinations of attractants for bark beetles and longicorn beetles in trapping wood-boring beetles
作  者：
WANG Yi-Ping1,*, GUO Rui2, DENG Jian-Yu1, ZHANG Zhen3 (1. School of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Lin’an, Zhejiang 311300, China; 2. Administration Bureau of Zhejiang Qingliangfeng National Nature Reserve, Lin’an, Zhejiang 311300, China; 3. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)
关键词：
Monochamus alternatus; bark beetles; attractant; trapping; wood-boring beetles
摘  要：
Monochamus alternatus Hope is the primary vector for spreading pine wilt disease. Use of attractants in the control of M. alternatus population is effective and pollution-free. In this study, the field test was conducted to evaluate the attractiveness of M. alternatus attractant combined with six kinds of bark beetle attractants to M. alternatus adults. The results showed that there was no significant difference among the combinations of each of bark beetle attractants for Tomicus minor Hartig (3-carene-10-ol), Ips typographus Linnaeus (2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol), Scolytus multistriatus Marsham (4-methyl-3-heptanol), and T. piniperda Linnaeus (verbenol) with M. alternatus attractant (P<0.05). The combinations of attractants for either Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte (exo-brevicomin) or D. pseudotsugae (1-methylcyclohex-2-en-l-ol) with M. alternatus attractant were less attractive to M. alternatus. Compared with M. alternatus attractant used only, the combination of either D. brevicomis or D. pseudotsugae with M. alternatus attractant was also less attractive as indicated by the species and number of wood-boring beetle individuals captured.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 13
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46