当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 比较PubMed,Scopus,Web of Science和Google Scholar的优点和缺点 农业图书情报学报 2010,22 (2) 109-112
Position: Home > Articles > Comparison of the Strengths and Weaknesses of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture 2010,22 (2) 109-112

比较PubMed,Scopus,Web of Science和Google Scholar的优点和缺点

作  者:
王丹
单  位:
河北医科大学图书馆
关键词:
引文分析;电子数据库;PubMed;Scopus;Web of Science;Google Scholar
摘  要:
PubMed,Scopus,Web of Science和Google Scholar是当代生物医学科学信息最流行的资源工具,本文旨在比较这四种数据库在特定生物医学主题中检索信息、更新引文分析的区别。用数据库的官方网页在期刊涵盖的范围、用于搜索的实用程序及其限制、更新频率、引文特征等进行比较。用实例对关键词搜索来评估这些数据库检索结果的特点,并检索特定的一篇文章查看其引文特征。
译  名:
Comparison of the Strengths and Weaknesses of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar
作  者:
WANG Dan(Library,Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang 050017,China)
关键词:
Citation analysis;electronic databases;PubMed;Scopus;Web of Science;Google Scholar
摘  要:
The paper has compared the utility of the current most popular sources of scientific information in biomedical sciences,namely PubMed,Scopus,Web of Science,and Google Scholar,in information retrieval on a specific biomedical subject and in up-to-date citation analysis.The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information on the range of journals covered,search facilities and restrictions,up-date frequency and differences of the citation analysis.The example of a keyword search was used to evaluate the usefulness of these databases in biomedical information retrieval and a specific published article to evaluate their utility in performing citation analysis.

相似文章

计量
文章访问数: 7
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊