中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 5种方法提取真菌基因组DNA作为PCR模板效果的比较 中国农学通报 2017,33 (16) 28-35
Position: Home > Articles > Effect Comparison of Five Methods to Extract Fungal Genomic DNA as PCR Templates Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2017,33 (16) 28-35

5种方法提取真菌基因组DNA作为PCR模板效果的比较

作  者：
李焕宇;付婷婷;张云;吕天佑;李远;徐秉良
单  位：
甘肃农业大学植物保护学院
关键词：
DNA提取;煤污病菌;CTAB;SDS;氯化苄;Chelex-100
摘  要：
本研究旨在比较CTAB法、改良CTAB法、SDS法、氯化苄法和Chelex-100法提取真菌DNA作为PCR模板的效果,以生长速率、菌落形态差异较大的11个煤污病菌属真菌为研究对象,以核糖体RNA(r RNA)基因中的内转录间隔区(ITS)序列和28S r RNA基因部分序列的扩增率为指标,采用SPSS软件对结果进行方差分析。结果表明,CTAB法和改良CTAB法适用真菌范围最广,分别有7个和9个属真菌的扩增率都大于70%且无显著性差异;氯化苄法和Chelex-100法适用范围居中,分别有6个和8个属真菌的扩增率较高且无显著性差异,扩增率分别大于70%和50%;SDS法适用范围最窄,有6个属真菌的扩增率高于50%且无显著性差异。大多数煤污病菌至少有2种及以上的DNA提取方法能够取得较好的效果,但链丝孢属真菌只有用氯化苄法提取DNA效果最好。采用改良CTAB法结合氯化苄法,能够满足所有供试煤污病菌类群真菌提取基因组DNA用作PCR反应模板的需要。
译  名：
Effect Comparison of Five Methods to Extract Fungal Genomic DNA as PCR Templates
作  者：
Li Huanyu;Fu Tingting;Zhang Yun;Lv Tianyou;Li Yuan;Xu Bingliang;College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University;
关键词：
DNA extraction;;sooty blotch and flyspeck fungi;;CTAB;;SDS;;benzyl chloride;;Chelex-100
摘  要：
The objective of this study was to compare the effect of fungal genomic DNA, which was extracted byfive methods including CTAB method, modified CTAB method, SDS method, benzyl chloride method andChelex-100 method, as PCR templates. Eleven sooty blotch and flyspeck(SBFS) fungal genera that exhibiteddifferent growth rates and colony characters were selected as tested fungi, and amplification percentages of PCRreactions of the internal transcribed spacers(ITS) and partial sequences of 28 S r RNA gene of ribosomal RNA(r RNA) were used as indexes, and the results were analyzed with SPSS software. The results showed that theCTAB method and the modified CTAB method were suitable for most fungi, respectively with seven and ninetested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 70% and had no significant differences. The benzylchloride method and the Chelex-100 method were suitable for partial fungi, respectively with six and eighttested fungal genera amplification percentage higher than 70% and 50%, and had no significant differences.The SDS method was suitable for only a narrow range of fungi, with six tested fungal genera amplificationpercentage higher than 50% and had no significant differences. There were at least two methods that couldperform well to extract DNA from most SBFS fungal genera, but only the benzyl chloride method gave the bestDNA extraction result for the genus Scleroramularia. Using modified CTAB method combined with the benzylchloride method could meet the need of extracting SBFS fungal genomic DNA as PCR templates.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 13
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46