Position: Home > Articles > Contrastive Analysis on Welfare Demand and Homestead Vacating Willingness of Farmers and Consolidation Mode of Different Types of Village—Based on Empirical Analysis of 30 Administrative Villages in Shandong
Shandong Agricultural Sciences
2014
(9)
146-151
不同类型村庄农户福利需求、宅基地腾退意愿及整理模式对比分析——基于山东省30个行政村实证分析
作 者:
张苗;陈银蓉;赵振国
单 位:
华中农业大学公共管理学院武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室;华中农业大学土地管理学院
关键词:
工矿型村庄;普通型村庄;农户福利;宅基地腾退;宅基地整理模式
摘 要:
宅基地整理工作已在全国多个省份展开试点,根据农户的意愿制定适合不同地域不同发展阶段的宅基地整理模式是当前趋势所在。本文以山东省30个行政村为研究对象,采用实地问卷调查和描述性统计相结合的方法,将其划分为工矿型和普通型两种村庄类型,并对两种类型村庄农户当前福利需求、闲置宅基地上交意愿和现居宅基地退出意愿进行了对比分析,藉此探讨了各自宅基地整理模式,得出结论如下:工矿型村庄在地形、公共服务设施、交通便利度以及集体经济实力等方面优于普通型村庄;两类型村庄农户都十分看重家人的健康、工资收入和社会保障三项福利,福利需求已由物质性需求向精神性需求过渡,且工矿型需求层次略高于普通型;71.93%的工矿型村庄农户和64.86%的普通型村庄农户认为闲置宅基地可以上交,但是希望当地政府给予经济补偿,工矿型村庄农户对宅基地依赖性更大,普通型村庄农户更加缺乏宅基地相关知识,90%以上的工矿型村庄农户和普通型村庄农户在政府给予一定的经济或其他形式的补偿措施下愿意退出现居宅基地;适合工矿型村庄的宅基地整理空间技术、组织管理、资金筹集和建制变动模式分别是迁村并点、政府组织、政府市场共同出资和建制式;普通型村庄依次为村庄改造控制、政府组织、政府投资和改造式。
译 名:
Contrastive Analysis on Welfare Demand and Homestead Vacating Willingness of Farmers and Consolidation Mode of Different Types of Village—Based on Empirical Analysis of 30 Administrative Villages in Shandong
作 者:
Zhang Miao;Chen Yinrong;Zhao Zhenguo;College of Public Management,Huazhong Agricultural University;State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science,Wuhan University;
关键词:
Industrial-type village;;Common village;;Farmers' welfare;;Homestead vacating;;Homestead consolidation mode
摘 要:
The homestead consolidation experiments had been conducted in a number of provinces. Developing a homestead consolidation mode according to farmers' willingness which was suitable for different stages in different areas was the current trend. Taking 30 administrative villages in Shandong as research objects,combining with the methods of field questionnaire survey and descriptive statistical analysis,they were divided into industrial- type or common villages. Then the farmers' current welfare demand,the willingness of handing in idle homestead and vacating living homestead of the two types of village were comparatively analyzed,and the respective homestead consolidation modes were discussed. The conclusions were as follows. The in-dustrial- type village was better than common village in terrain,public service facilities,degree of transportation convenience and collective economic strength. The farmers of both two types of village regarded family's health,wages and social security as important benefits,their welfare demand transformed from material to spiritual,and the demand levels of industrial- type village was slightly higher than those of common village. Both71. 93% farmers of industrial- type village and 64. 86% farmers of common village were willing to hand in the idle homestead with financial compensation from local government. The farmers of industrial- type village had greater dependence on homestead than those of common village who were more lack of knowledge about homestead. More than 90% farmers of two types of village were willing to vacating living homestead with certain financial or other forms of compensation. The modes for homestead consolidation space technology,organizational management,fund raising and institution change of industrial- type village were village merger,government organization,government and market co- investment and construction respectively; and those of common village were village reconstruction and control,government organization,government investment and transformation respectively.