中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 不同生产方式下肉鹅养殖场地的贡献及生产效果 中国农业大学学报 2013,18 (4) 129-133
Position: Home > Articles > Contribution of goose feeding space and production effects on the different production modes Journal of China Agricultural University 2013,18 (4) 129-133

不同生产方式下肉鹅养殖场地的贡献及生产效果

作  者：
关法春;田飞鹏;沙志鹏;王军峰;李少坷
单  位：
西藏大学农牧学院
关键词：
鹅;农牧一体化;养殖场地;贡献率
摘  要：
为明确不同生产方式下肉鹅养殖场地空间转移动态和养殖效果,以及养殖场地对肉鹅养殖的贡献,对传统草地养鹅和"农牧一体化"农田养殖方式进行对比研究。结果表明:肉鹅养殖场地存在明显的空间转移现象,不同处理下农田和草地对肉鹅养殖的贡献率分别为74.49%和98.7%,农田在肉鹅养殖中的贡献率虽然低于草地,但仍在肉鹅养殖中占据主要地位;农田养鹅处理的肉鹅出栏体重比草地养鹅处理的减少0.21kg,与草地养鹅处理差异不显著(n=3,P>0.05),而且达到了商品销售的体重要求;不同方式下的肉鹅养殖均取得较好的经济效益,但草地养鹅每只肉鹅的净收入高于农田养鹅收入14元。"农牧一体化"生产方式下的农田养鹅模式,能够完成肉鹅的整个商品化养殖过程并取得良好经济效果。
译  名：
Contribution of goose feeding space and production effects on the different production modes
作  者：
GUAN Fa-chun 1,2,3,TIAN Fei-peng 1,SHA Zhi-peng 1,WANG Jun-feng 1,LI Shao-ke 1(1.Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College,Tibet University,Linzhi 860000,China;2.Engineering and Technology Research Center for Prataculture on the Tibet Plateau,Lhasa 850000,China;3.Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lhasa 850000,China)
关键词：
goose;agro-pastoral integration;feeding space;contribution rate
摘  要：
Dynamics of transference of feeding spaces,feeding effects and the contribution ratio of different feeding spaces for goose were compared to the research between different feeding modes.The results showed that the dynamics of transference of feeding spaces changed significantly,and the contribution ratio of cropland and grassland for goose was 74.49% and 98.71%respectively in different treatments.Cropland accounted for the main part in goose breeding though the contribution ratio of cropland was lower than that of grassland.Compared with the treatment of feeding on grassland,the goose weight for sale in the treatment of feeding on cropland decreased by 0.21kg,which met the market requirement,and the differences about body weight of goose between the two treatments were not significant(n=3,P>0.05).Good economic benefits were achieved through the goose breeding under different production modes,and the net income of per goose in the treatment of feeding on grassland increased 14yuan than that in the treatment of feeding on farmland.Therefore the feeding on farmland under the production mode of agro-pastoral integration could finish the whole commercialized course of goose feeding and get good economic effects.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 12
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 1

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46