Position: Home > Articles > Argument and Refutation on the Decision of Administrative Penalty
China Animal Health Inspection
2016,33
(10)
47-49+57
行政处罚决定书的论证与反驳
作 者：
闫文彤
单 位：
北京市顺义区动物卫生监督所
关键词：
法律三段论;法律文书;有效性证明;行政复议;行政诉讼;无效性证明
摘 要：
本文对动物卫生监督执法案例的行政处罚决定书进行了分析,将决定书分为案由、违法条款、处罚依据和处罚内容四个要点,并将这四个要点翻译为四个命题。通过这对四个命题进行逻辑推理,提出了相应的逻辑语言符号。进一步运用这四个要点的逻辑符号进行推理,提出了处罚决定书的论证方法、违法条款的认证方法和针对处罚决定意见存在异议时的反驳方法。
译 名：
Argument and Refutation on the Decision of Administrative Penalty
作 者：
Yan Wentong;Shunyi Animal Health Inspection Institution;
关键词：
legal syllogism;;legal instrument;;proof of validity;;administrative reconsideration;;administrative litigation;;proof of invalidity
摘 要：
Based on cases about animal health supervision and law enforcement,analysis on the written decisions of administrative penalty was carried out. According to the analysis,these decisions of administrative penalty contained four important statements that can be translated into four propositions. By logical deduction,corresponding logical linguistic signs were raised,and through further logical deduction using the logical signs,three treatment methods for such cases were proposed,which included demonstrating method for the written decisions of penalty,authentication method for illegal provisions,and refutation method when disagreeing the penalty decisions.
导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 12
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0
所属期刊
