当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 高黎贡山南段4种典型植被类型枯落物层持水性能研究 西部林业科学 2012,41 (3) 8-13
Position: Home > Articles > Study on Water Holding Capacity of Litter of Four Typical Vegetation Types in South Section of Gaoligongshan Mountain Journal of West China Forestry Science 2012,41 (3) 8-13

高黎贡山南段4种典型植被类型枯落物层持水性能研究

作  者:
孟广涛;文毅;柴勇;袁春明;艾怀森;蔺汝涛;李品荣;李贵祥
单  位:
云南省林业科学院;西南林业大学环境科学与工程学院;高黎贡山自然保护局;北京师范大学
关键词:
高黎贡山;植被类型;枯落物层;持水性能
摘  要:
采用野外测定与室内实验分析相结合的方法,对高黎贡山南段4种典型植被类型枯落物层持水性能进行对比研究。研究结果表明,(1)枯落物总厚度为天然阔叶林>旱冬瓜林>杉木人工林>次生阔叶林,其中未分解层枯落物厚度为旱冬瓜林>天然阔叶林>杉木人工林>次生阔叶林,半分解层枯落物厚度为天然阔叶林>杉木人工林>旱冬瓜林>次生阔叶林;枯落物总贮量为天然阔叶林>次生阔叶林>旱冬瓜林>杉木人工林,其中未分解层枯落物贮量为次生阔叶林>天然阔叶林>杉木人工林>旱冬瓜林,半分解层枯落物贮量为天然阔叶林>旱冬瓜林>次生阔叶林>杉木人工林;(2)未分解层及半分解层最大持水量均为天然阔叶林>杉木人工林>旱冬瓜林>次生阔叶林;(3)未分解层及半分解层持水速度均为天然阔叶林>杉木人工林>旱冬瓜林>次生阔叶林。因此,4种植被类型枯落物层持水性能以天然阔叶林为最好。
译  名:
Study on Water Holding Capacity of Litter of Four Typical Vegetation Types in South Section of Gaoligongshan Mountain
作  者:
MENG Guang-tao1,2,WEN Yi3,CHAI Yong2,YUAN Chun-ming2, AI Huai-sen4,LIN Ru-tao4,LI Pin-rong2,LI Gui-xiang2(1.Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,P.R.China;2.Yunnan Academy of Forestry,Kunming Yunnan 650201,P.R.China; 3.College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming Yunnan 650224,P.R.China, 4.Management Bureau of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve,Baoshan Yunnan 678000,P.R.China)
关键词:
Gaoligongshan Mountain;vegetation type;litter;water holding capacity
摘  要:
The water holding capacities of litters of four typical vegetations in south section of Gaoligongshan mountain were studied through field determination,indoor experiments and analysis.The study results were as follows: 1) The thickness of litter was in the order of natural broadleaved forest >Alnus nepalensis forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation > secondary broadleaved forest;among which,the thickness of undecomposed litter was in the order of Alnus nepalensis forest > natural broadleaved forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation > secondary broadleaved forest;the thickness of semi-decomposed litter was in the order of natural broadleaved forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation >Alnus nepalensis forest > secondary broadleaved forest.The total storage of litter was in the order of natural broadleaved forest > secondary broadleaved forest >Alnus nepalensis forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation,among which,the storage of undecomposed litter was in the order of secondary broadleaved forest > natural broadleaved forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation > Alnus nepalensis forest,the storage of semi-decomposed litter was in the order of natural broadleaved forest >Alnus nepalensis forest > secondary broadleaved forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation.2) The maximum water holding capacity of undecomposed litter and semi-decomposed litter was in the order of natural broadleaved forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation >Alnus nepalensis forest > secondary broadleaved forest.3) The speed of water holding of undecomposed litter and semi-decomposed litter was in the order of natural broadleaved forest >Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation >Alnus nepalensis forest > secondary broadleaved forest.In conclusion,the water holding capacity of natural broadleaved forest was the best among these four vegetations.

相似文章

计量
文章访问数: 18
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊