中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 深圳市居住区绿化树种抗风性评价方法对比研究与树种分级选择 亚热带水土保持 2020 (2) 7-15+40
Position: Home > Articles > Comparative Study on Evaluation Methods of Wind Resistance and Classification of Greening Tree Species in Residential Areas of Shenzhen City——Taking the Typhoon "Mangosteen " as an Example Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation 2020 (2) 7-15+40

深圳市居住区绿化树种抗风性评价方法对比研究与树种分级选择

作  者：
毛君竹;宫彦章;郑卫国;申凯歌;曾鹏飞;李军娟;高育慧
单  位：
关键词：
综合评价法;模糊隶属函数法;聚类分析;抗风性
摘  要：
台风"山竹"过后,对深圳市居住区50种绿化树种风害受损情况和植物形态学指标进行调查统计,通过综合评价法和模糊隶属函数法对50种绿化树种的抗风能力进行评价,并分别对两种评价结果进行聚类对比分析。综合评价法表明一级抗风树种40种,二级抗风树种10种,模糊隶属函数法表明一级抗风树种33种,二级抗风树种17种。两种评价方法的一级抗风树种的交集树种有32种,二级抗风树种的交集树种有10种,两种聚类分级结果中有42种树种完全一样,其余8种树种分类结果相近,表明其对绿化树种的抗风性评价与分级结果较为一致。在今后居住区的规划设计中,应尽可能选用两种评价方法的一级抗风树种的交集树种,合理运用其他树种。
译  名：
Comparative Study on Evaluation Methods of Wind Resistance and Classification of Greening Tree Species in Residential Areas of Shenzhen City——Taking the Typhoon "Mangosteen " as an Example
作  者：
MaoJunzhu;Gong Yanzhang;Zheng Weiguo;Shen Kaige;Zeng Pengfei;Li Junjuan;Gao Yuhui;Shenzhen Wenke Garden Co., Ltd./Guangdong Provincial Landscape Architecture and Ecological Restoration Engineering Technology Research Center;
关键词：
comprehensive evaluation method;;fuzzy membership function method;;cluster analysis;;wind resistance
摘  要：
After the typhoon "Mangosteen", it has been surveyed and added up the wind damage status and plant morphological indexes of 50 greening tree species in residential area of Shenzhen City. The wind-resistant ability of 50 greening tree species was evaluated by comprehensive evaluation method and fuzzy membership function method, and the cluster comparative analysis was made to the evaluation results respecitvely. The result of comprehensive evaluation showed that there were 40 first-class wind-resistant tree species and 10 second-class wind-resistant tree species, while the result of fuzzy membership function evaluation indicated that there were 33 first-class wind-resistant tree species and 17 second-class wind-resistant tree species. Of which, there were 32 tress species of first-class wind resistence and 10 tree species of second-class wind resistence overlapped under these two evaluation methods. In addition, 42 tree species appeared exactly the same while the rest 8 tree species appeared similar in the results of cluster classfication. The cluster analysis on the results of two evaluation methods showes that, these two methods are cosistent in the wind-resistence evaluation and the classification of greening tree speices. In the future planning and designing of residential areas, the overlapped first-class wind resistence tree species selected by these two methods should be applied as much as possible together with the reasonable application of the other tree speices.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 6
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46