中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 套餐肥对设施番茄产量及品质的影响 农学学报 2018 (12) 62-67
Position: Home > Articles > Effect of Package Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato Journal of Agriculture 2018 (12) 62-67

套餐肥对设施番茄产量及品质的影响

作  者：
孙喜军;吕爽;王安;王小荣;孟菁;高莹;李静;郝红艳
单  位：
咸阳职业技术学院;西安市长安区农业技术推广中心;西安市农业技术推广中心
关键词：
套餐肥;番茄;产量;品质;经济效益
摘  要：
以设施番茄为例,探讨不同套餐肥肥效,以期为西安市设施番茄优质高效生产提供一定的理论依据。试验采用田间试验方法,设置施用济邦牌番茄套餐肥(T_1)、施用欣金谷牌番茄套餐肥(T_2)和施用元丰牌复合肥(T_3,CK,即常规施肥对照)3个试验处理,研究不同处理对番茄产量、品质及经济效益的影响。结果表明:(1)经过一季番茄栽培后,处理T_1、T_2、T_3对土壤有机质含量影响不明显,但处理T_1、T_2有助于降低设施碱性土壤的pH值和电导率;(2)处理T_3的番茄植株株高、径粗、株幅及茎叶干重等指标均高于处理T_1、T_2,但番茄单果重、产量、可溶性固形物和维生素C含量以及经济效益却低于处理T_1、T_2。总体而言,施用2种套餐肥均优于常规施肥,但施用济邦牌套餐肥肥料成本更低,经济效益更高,能更好实现节本增效和增收目的。
译  名：
Effect of Package Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato
作  者：
Sun Xijun;Lv Shuang;Wang An;Wang Xiaorong;Meng Jing;Gao Ying;Li Jing;Hao Hongyan;Xi'an Agricultural Technology Extension Center;Xianyang Vocational Technical College;Chang'an Agricultural Technology Extension Center;
单  位：
Sun Xijun%Lv Shuang%Wang An%Wang Xiaorong%Meng Jing%Gao Ying%Li Jing%Hao Hongyan%Xi'an Agricultural Technology Extension Center%Xianyang Vocational Technical College%Chang'an Agricultural Technology Extension Center
关键词：
Package Fertilizers;;Tomato;;Yield;;Quality;;Economic Benefit
摘  要：
Effects of different package fertilizers on tomato in facility were studied to provide references forhigh quality and high efficient production of tomato in Xi'an. Gibon package fertilizers(T_1), Jingu packagefertilizers(T_2) and Yuanfeng compound fertilizers(T_3, CK, namely the conventional fertilization) were used toset up three fertilization treatments. T_he results showed that:(1) as to soil organic matters, there was no obviousdifference among the treatments after one season cultivation, however, compared with T_3, T_1 and T_2 lowered thesoil pH value and electrical conductivity;(2) the plant height, stem diameter, plant width and dry weight ofstem and leaf of T_3 were higher than those of T_1 and T_2, but tomato fruit weight, yield, soluble solid, vitamin Ccontent and economic benefit of T_3 were lower than those of T_1 and T_2, respectively. In general, the effect ofGibon package fertilizers and Jingu package fertilizers are superior to that of the conventional fertilization,however, the Gibon package fertilizers has lower cost and a higher economic benefit compared with Jingupackage fertilizers, and could better attain the goal of cost-efficiency.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 7
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46