中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 小流域土壤可蚀性的空间变异及其在不同土地类型下的比较 土壤通报 2011,42 (3) 715-720
Position: Home > Articles > Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility and its Comparison between Different Landuse Types of Small Watershed Chinese Journal of Soil Science 2011,42 (3) 715-720

小流域土壤可蚀性的空间变异及其在不同土地类型下的比较

作  者：
周璟;张旭东;何丹;周金星;王中建
单  位：
慈利县林业局;广州地理研究所;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所;中国林业科学研究院林业研究所
关键词：
土壤可蚀性;空间变异;土地类型;山区小流域
摘  要：
以武陵山区女儿寨小流域为研究区,在流域内进行高密度采样的基础上,利用EPIC模型中土壤可蚀性K值计算方法与地统计学分析方法计算并分析了流域土壤可蚀性K值及其空间变异,结合流域土地利用图,运用面积加权平均计算了各土地利用类型下的K值并进行比较,结果表明:流域K值变化范围为0.2451~0.4623,均值为0.3289,变异系数为0.1295,流域K值存在中等程度的空间变异。K值总体分布趋势为从流域海拔低处向海拔高处逐渐减小,受人为干扰较多的区域其K值也较高。各土地利用类型下的面积加权平均K值,以果园0.3769最大,油桐0.2607最小,植被类型下的K值均低于除耕地外受人为影响因素较大的地类,说明植被在不同程度上改善了土壤性质,提高了土壤的抗侵蚀能力,但K值的大小与植被类型的差异有关。
译  名：
Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility and its Comparison between Different Landuse Types of Small Watershed
作  者：
ZHOU Jing 1,2,ZHANG Xu-dong 2 ,HE Dan 3,ZHOU Jin-xing 2,WANG Zhong-jian 4(1.Guangzhou Institute of Geography,Guangzhou 510070,China;2.Research Institute of Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation,State Forestry Administration,Beijing 100091,China;3.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing 100101,China;4.Forestry Bureau of Cili County,Zhangjiajie 415300,China)
关键词：
Soil Erodibility;Spatial variability;Landuse type;Montanic watershed
摘  要：
Taking the small watershed in Nverzhai of Wuling Mountain as study area,this paper calculated soil erodibility(K-factor)and analyzed its spatial variability by using EPIC model and geostatistical method based on large sampling densities in watershed.Combining with landuse map,this study compared K values of different land use types by using area weighted average method.The result showed that K values were between 0.2451-0.4623.Mean of K value was 0.3289 and variance coefficient was 0.1295.Spatial variability of K had comparatively significant difference.The whole distribution tendency was higher in low elevation than in high elevation.K value was also high in areas where further affected by human activity.The maximum of K value was in orchard(0.3769) and the minimum was in Tung tree(0.2607).K values of vegetation types were generally lower than the areas further affected by human activity except farmland.This showed vegetation improved soil quality and ability to resist soil erosion of different degree,but K values correlated to vegetation type.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 7
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46