Position: Home > Articles > Calculation of critical hydrological drought duration based on EVT method and MC model
Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition)
2018,46
(11)
129-135
基于EVT法和MC模型的极限水文干旱历时计算研究
作 者：
赵纬;宋松柏;张更喜
单 位：
西北农林科技大学水利与建筑工程学院
关键词：
极限水文干旱历时;马尔科夫链;极值理论;径流预测;黄河流域
摘 要：
【目的】研究极值理论(extreme value theory,EVT)法和马尔科夫链(Markov chain,MC)模型在极限干旱历时计算中的预测精度,为区域干旱历时预报提供依据。【方法】以黄河流域兰州、龙门、白马寺3个水文站年径流序列为例,利用EVT法和MC模型2种方法分别计算不同截断水平对应的极限干旱历时(Expected longest duration,E(LT)),并采用纳什效率系数(Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient,NS)和平均绝对百分误差(Mean absolute percentage error,MAPE)评价2种方法的计算精度。【结果】兰州、龙门、白马寺3个水文站采用EVT法计算的极限干旱历时值E(LT)与对应观测值(Observed longest duration,LT-ob)的NS和MAPE分别为0.921 0,0.854 6,0.929 4和0.046 0,0.155 5,0.039 1;而一阶马尔科夫链(one-order Markov chain,MC-1)模型结合hazen绘点位置公式计算的极限干旱历时值与对应观测值的NS和MAPE分别为0.824 7,0.668 1,0.908 1和0.206 3,0.327 3,0.104 6。2种方法均可取得较好的计算效果,但EVT法的计算精度优于MC-1模型。【结论】EVT法较MC-1模型所需要的参数少,计算过程较为简单,且计算结果误差小,是黄河流域可行的极限干旱历时计算方法。
译 名：
Calculation of critical hydrological drought duration based on EVT method and MC model
作 者：
ZHAO Wei;SONG Songbai;ZHANG Gengxi;College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering,Northwest A&F University;
关键词：
critical hydrologic drought duration;;Markov chain;;extreme value theory;;runoff forecast;;Yellow River Basin
摘 要：
【Objective】This study investigated the accuracy of the extreme value theory(EVT)and the Markov chain(MC)model in predicting critical drought duration on regional scale.【Method】Based on the annual runoff data of 3 hydrological stations in the Yellow River Basin,critical drought duration was modeled using two methods with different threshold levels.The best method was obtained based on Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient and mean absolute percentage error.【Result】The values of NS and MAPE based on EVT at Lanzhou,Longmen and Baimasi hydrological stations were 0.921 0,0.854 6,0.929 4 and0.046 0,0.155 5,0.039 1 respectively,while those based on the one-order Markov chain model(MC-1)and hazen were 0.824 7,0.668 1,0.908 1 and 0.206 3,0.327 3,0.104 6,respectively.High accuracy was obtained by both methods,and EVT was better.【Conclusion】Compared with the MC-1 models,EVT was simpler,more accurate with less parameters in predicting critical drought durations for the Yellow River Basin.
相似文章
-
极限水文干旱历时概率分布解析法研究 [袁超, 宋松柏, 荆萍] 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版) 2008,36 (7) 212-218
