中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > EDDS与EDTA强化苎麻修复镉铅污染土壤 农业环境科学学报 2015,34 (07) 1293-1300
Position: Home > Articles > EDTA and EDDS Enhanced Remediation of Cd and Pb Contaminated Soil by Ramie(Boehmeria Nivea) Journal of Agro-Environment Science 2015,34 (07) 1293-1300

EDDS与EDTA强化苎麻修复镉铅污染土壤

作  者：
刘金;殷宪强;孙慧敏;吕家珑;韦革宏
单  位：
西北农林科技大学资源环境学院;西北农林科技大学生命科学学院
关键词：
EDDS;EDTA;苎麻;污染土壤;强化修复
摘  要：
为探明施用生物可降解螯合剂乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对苎麻修复重金属污染土壤的效果,通过盆栽试验研究了镉、铅复合污染黄褐土中施加EDTA和EDDS对苎麻生物量、叶片中丙二醛含量及重金属镉、铅积累特性的影响。结果表明:相比单一种植苎麻,施加EDTA和EDDS都能显著增强苎麻植株各部位铅、镉的含量,提升苎麻对土壤中重金属的修复效果。在浓度为1.5~3mmol·kg-1时,EDDS强化苎麻修复镉的效果较好,土壤镉的去除效率相比对照提高了16%~27%,在更高浓度时,EDTA强化苎麻修复镉的效果较好;EDTA强化苎麻修复土壤铅的效果好于EDDS,对土壤铅的去除效果可提高达22.6%。但EDTA和EDDS的施加会造成苎麻生物量减少,叶片丙二醛含量增加,在同等浓度水平下,EDDS对苎麻生长产生的不利影响要小于EDTA。
译  名：
EDTA and EDDS Enhanced Remediation of Cd and Pb Contaminated Soil by Ramie(Boehmeria Nivea)
作  者：
LIU Jin;YIN Xian-qiang;SUN Hui-min;L Jia-long;WEI Ge-hong;College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University;Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-environment in Northwest China Ministry of Agriculture;College of Life Science, Northwest A&F University;
关键词：
EDDS;;EDTA;;ramie;;contaminated soil;;enhanced remediation
摘  要：
Ramie(Boehmeria nivea)has showed potential to remediate heavy metal contaminated soils. However, low availability of heavy metals in soils limits the remediation efficiencies. Here a pot experiment was conducted to assess the effects of two chelating agents, ethylene diamine disuccinate(EDDS)and ethylene diamine tetraacetate(EDTA), on the uptake of Cd and Pb by ramie in Cd and Pb contaminated yellow-cinnamon soil. Biomass and malondialdehyde(MDA) content of ramie and concentrations of Cd and Pb in both different parts of ramie and soil were measured. The total content of Cd and Pb in leaf, shoot and root of ramie grown in EDTA and EDDS treated soils increased significantly, suggesting the activation of heavy metals in the soils. At 1.5 mmol·kg-1to 3 mmol·kg-1of chelating agents, EDDS performed better in Cd accumulation than EDTA did, with Cd removal being 16% to 27% greater than the control(no chelating agent). At higher than 3 mmol·kg-1of chelating agents, however, ramie with EDTA treatment had higher Cd concentration than that with EDDS. For Pb contaminated soil, EDTA activated Pb better than EDDS did, and the removal efficiency of Pb by ramie increased by up to 22.6%. Applications of both EDTA and EDDS reduced ramie biomass but improved the content of MDA in leaves. However, EDDS showed less adverse effects on ramie than EDTA did at the same concentrations.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 4
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46