中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 基于DPSIR-TOPSIS模型的黄河内蒙古段十大孔兑综合治理生态环境效应评估 水土保持通报 2016,36 (1) 143-150
Position: Home > Articles > Eco-environmental Benefits Evalution of Ten Tributaries Comprehensive Management Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model in Inner Mongolia Section of Yellow River Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 2016,36 (1) 143-150

基于DPSIR-TOPSIS模型的黄河内蒙古段十大孔兑综合治理生态环境效应评估

作  者：
赵振亚;姬宝霖;宋小园;李超;乔楠
单  位：
内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院;鄂尔多斯市水土保持局
关键词：
流域;综合治理;十大孔兑;生态环境效应;DPSIR模型;AHP-熵权法;TOPSIS模型
摘  要：
[目的]对区域综合治理现状进行评估,为政府制定政策提供相关理论依据。[方法]将DPSIR概念模型引入流域综合治理生态环境效应评价指标体系,并运用AHP-熵权法和TOPSIS法对黄河内蒙古段十大孔兑综合治理现状进行生态环境效应评估。[结果]十大孔兑综合治理现状评价值由高到低为:罕台川>西柳沟>哈什拉川>呼斯太河>毛不拉>木哈尔河>东柳沟>卜尔嘎色太沟>黑濑沟>壕庆河。综合效应指数呈中间高,两边低的趋势,仅罕台川等级为Ⅱ级,其他孔兑都为Ⅳ级,各孔兑整体上生态环境效应指数较低,综合治理现状较差。[结论]DPSIR-TOPSIS模型内部结构清晰,较好地解释了流域综合治理工程与环境—经济—社会系统间的内在联系,评价方法采取了主客观相结合的方法,也更为合理,为流域综合治理生态环境效应提供了一种新的方法和思路。
译  名：
Eco-environmental Benefits Evalution of Ten Tributaries Comprehensive Management Based on DPSIR-TOPSIS Model in Inner Mongolia Section of Yellow River
作  者：
ZHAO Zhenya;JI Baolin;SONG Xiaoyuan;LI Chao;QIAO Nan;Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University;Soil and Water Conservation Bureau of Erdos City;
关键词：
watershed;;control;;ten tributaries;;eco-environmental effect;;DPSIR model;;AHP-entropy method;;TOPSIS model
摘  要：
[Objective]To assess the benefits of comprehensive management and provide support for government policy making.[Methods]The concept of DPSIR model was introduced into the eco-environment benefit evaluation index system.AHP-entropy and TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the eco-environment benefit of the comprehensive management in ten tributaries in Inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River.[Results]Value of the integrated management in ten tributaries from highest to lowest was:Hantaichuang>Xiliugou >Hashilachuang >Husitaihe>Maobula>Muhaerhe>Dongliugou >Boergasetaigou >Heilaigou>Haoqinghe.The comprehensive effect index was high in the middle,but low in both sides.Hantaichuan was classⅡ,while the other tributaries was classⅣ,and the comprehensive management in this region was poor.[Conclusion]The internal structure of the DPSIR-TOPSIS model was clear,and it well explained the intrinsic link between watershed comprehensive management engineering and environment-economy-society system.This study provides a new method for assessing the eco-environment benefit of comprehensive management.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 15
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46