中国农业期刊集成服务平台

当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > Stability evaluation of the PROSPECT model for leaf chlorophyll content retrieval 国际农业与生物工程学报 2021,14 (5)

Position: Home > Articles > Stability evaluation of the PROSPECT model for leaf chlorophyll content retrieval International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 2021,14 (5)

Stability evaluation of the PROSPECT model for leaf chlorophyll content retrieval

作者：

Li Zhai;Lijuan Wan;Dalin Sun;Alwaseela Abdalla;Yu Zhu;Xiaoran Li;Yong He;Haiyan Ce

关键词：

leaf chlorophyll content;oilseed rape;PROSPECT;spectral resolution;spectral noise;nitrogen treatment;SPATIAL-RESOLUTION;RADIATIVE-TRANSFER;AREA INDEX;PARAMETERS;INVERSION;COMBINATION;LA

摘要：

The radiative transfer model, PROSPECT, has been widely applied for retrieving leaf biochemical traits. However, few work has been conducted to evaluate the stability of the PROSPECT model with considering multiple factors (i.e., spectral resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, plant growth stages, and treatments). This study aims to investigate the stability of the PROSPECT model for retrieving leaf chlorophyll (Chl) content (C-ab). Leaf hemispherical reflectance and transmittance of oilseed rape were acquired at different spectral resolutions, noise levels, growth stages, and nitrogen treatments. The Chl content was also measured destructively by using a microplate spectrophotometer. The performance of the PROSPECT model was compared with a commonly used random forest (RF) model. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of PROSPECT and RF models for C-ab, did not produce significant differences under varied spectral resolutions ranging from 1 to 20 nm. The ranges of the relative root mean square errors (rRMSE) of the PROSPECT and RF models were 12%-13% and 11.70%-12.86%, respectively. However, the performance of both models for leaf Chl retrieval was strongly influenced by the noise level with the rRMSE of 13-15.37% and 12.04%-15.80% for PROSPECT and RF, respectively. For different growth stages, the PROSPECT model had similar prediction accuracies (rRMSE = 9.26%-12.41%) to the RF model (rRMSE = 9.17%-12.70%). Furthermore, the superiority of the PROSPECT model (rRMSE = 10.10%-12.82%) over the RF model (rRMSE = 11.81%-15.47%) was prominently observed when tested with plants growth at different nitrogen treatment levels. The results demonstrated that the PROSPECT model has a more stable performance than the RF model for all datasets in this study.

相似文章

Identifying glyphosate-tolerant maize by soaking seeds in glyphosate solution [Yan Shu-Feng, Muhammad, Sher, Liu Hai-Fang, Tie Shuang-Gui, Sun Shu-Ku] 农业科学学报 (英文) 2018,17 (10)
Leaf chlorophyll content retrieval of wheat by simulated RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and EnMAP data [Cui Bei, Zhao Qian-jun, Huang Wen-jiang, Song Xiao-yu, Ye Hui-chun, Zhou Xian-feng] 农业科学学报 (英文) 2019,18 (6)
Identifying glyphosate-tolerant maize by soaking seeds in glyphosate solution [Shufeng Yan, Sher Muhammad, Haifang Liu, Shuanggui Tie, Shu-ku Su] 农业科学学报(英文版) 2018,17 (10)
Leaf chlorophyll content retrieval of wheat by simulated RapidEye, Sentinel-2 and EnMAP data [Bin Cui, Qian Zhao, Wenjiang Huang, Xiaoyu Song, Huichun Ye, Xuliang Zho] 农业科学学报(英文版) 2019,18 (6)

导出引用

计量

文章访问数: 7

HTML全文浏览量: 0

PDF下载量: 0

Stability evaluation of the PROSPECT model for leaf chlorophyll content retrieval

相似文章

所属期刊

国际农业与生物工程学报

推荐期刊

农业科学学报 (英文)