中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > Forest mapping: a comparison between hyperspectral and multispectral images and technologies 林业研究(英文版) 2018,29 (5)
Position: Home > Articles > Forest mapping: a comparison between hyperspectral and multispectral images and technologies Journal of Forestry Research 2018,29 (5)

Forest mapping: a comparison between hyperspectral and multispectral images and technologies

作  者：
Mohamad M. Awa
单  位：
Remote Sensing Center, National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebano
关键词：
Classification;Economy;Hyperspectral;Multispectral;Spectral signatures;Stone pine;AGREEMENT;LANDSA
摘  要：
Mapping forests is an important process in managing natural resources. At present, due to spectral resolution limitations, multispectral images do not give a complete separation between different forest species. In contrast, advances in remote sensing technologies have provided hyperspectral tools and images as a solution for the determination of species. In this study, spectral signatures for stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) forests were collected using an advanced spectroradiometer "ASD FieldSpec 4 Hi-Res" with an accuracy of 1 nm. These spectral signatures are used to compare between different multispectral and hyperspectral satellite images. The comparison is based on processing satellite images: hyperspectral Hyperion, hyperspectral CHRIS-Proba, Advanced Land Imager (ALI), and Landsat 8. Enhancement and classification methods for hyperspectral and multispectral images are investigated and analyzed. In addition, a well-known hyperspectral image classification algorithm, spectral angle mapper (SAM), has been improved to perform the classification process efficiently based on collected spectral signatures. The results show that the modified SAM is 9% more accurate than the conventional SAM. In addition, experiments indicate that the CHRIS-Proba image is more accurate than Landsat 8 (overall accuracy 82%, precision 93%, and Kappa coefficient 0.43 compared to 60, 67%, and 0.035, respectively). Similarly, Hyperion is better than ALI in mapping stone pine (overall accuracy 92%, precision 97%, and Kappa coefficient 0.74 compared to 52, 56%, and - 0.032, respectively).

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 11
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46