摘 要：
张海秋的《剑属语音在吾国语音学上之地位》引发了近代中国林学与民俗学两位大家间的论争。张海秋因术攻林学后兼修语言而被视为可能有研究积累不足的短处,而江绍原则有在读解张海秋之文中有过度阐释之可能。《易林·随之否》中的"鹿求其子,虎庐之里"的语序及唐伯与寅伯是论争的焦点。从汉代诗文并非一定要押韵、原文语意、平仄、文献考察及张海秋提供的两点原因(庐、里之古意及里与许均为u韵)可知,《易林》原文为"鹿求其子,虎庐之里"及"唐伯"。从这场论争可看到,张海秋有跨学科研究的学术旨趣。在论争中,张海秋旁征博引、注重跨学科研究,并从音韵学或等韵学的角度进行阐释,特别是总结训诂研究的五大原则,堪称学术之大器与要法。
译 名：
The Focus and Related Issues of the Debate Between Zhang Haiqiu and Jiang Shaoyuan
作 者：
Li Guoxin;School of Literature and Law, Southwest Forestry University;
关键词：
Zhang Haiqiu;;Jiang Shaoyuan;;debate;;Yi Lin·Sui Zhi Fou
摘 要：
Zhang Haiqiu′s The position of Jianchuan′s phonetics in China′s phonetics triggered a debate between modern Chinese forestry and folklore. Zhang Haiqiu is considered to have the disadvantage of insufficient research accumulation because he concurrently studied language after his research focusing on forestry, and Jiang Shaoyuan may be over explained in reading and interpreting Zhang Haiqiu′s works. The word order of ′Lu Qiu Qi Zi, Hu Lu Zhi Li′ in Yi Lin·Sui Zhi Fou and Tang Bo and Yin Bo are the focus of debate. It can be seen from the fact that the poems and prose of the Han Dynasty do not have to rhyme, the original meaning, level and oblique tones, literature review and the 2 reasons provided by Zhang Haiqiu(the ancient meaning of Lu and Li, Li and Xu are u rhymes). The original text of Yi Lin is ′Lu Qiu Qi Zi, Hu Lu Zhi Li′ and ′Tang Bo′. From this debate, we can see that Zhang Haiqiu has the academic purport of interdisciplinary research. In the debate, Zhang Haiqiu cited extensively, paid attention to interdisciplinary research, explained it from the perspective of phonology or equiprosody, especially summarized the 5 principles of exegesis research, which can be called the great tool and important method of academia.
