Position: Home > Articles > Identification of Hapten-Carrier Protein Conjugate by Three Electrophoresis Methods
Scientia Agricultura Sinica
2010,43
(3)
565-570
半抗原-载体蛋白偶联物的三种电泳鉴定方法
作 者:
雷红涛;庞杰;贺丽苹;杨金易;孙远明;秦毅兰;梁明标
单 位:
华南农业大学分析测试中心;华南农业大学食品学院/广东省食品质量安全重点实验室
关键词:
半抗原-载体蛋白偶联物;SDS-PAGE;非变性琼脂糖凝胶电泳;毛细管区带电泳
摘 要:
【目的】建立一种简单方便的半抗原-载体蛋白偶联物电泳鉴定方法。【方法】选用SDS-PAGE、非变性琼脂糖凝胶电泳、高效毛细管区带电泳3种方法对载体蛋白、偶联剂变性的载体蛋白、半抗原-载体蛋白进行比较鉴定,同时与光谱法结果比较。【结果】对分子量差异较小的载体蛋白和半抗原-载体蛋白偶联物,SDS-PAGE不能有效分辨;但偶联前后载体电荷有变化时,非变性琼脂糖凝胶电泳却能有效分辨游离的载体蛋白和半抗原-载体蛋白偶联物,相对SDS-PAGE表现出更高的分辨灵敏度;毛细管区带电泳能高效分辨载体和半抗原-载体蛋白偶联物,结果直观,但需较贵重的专用仪器。琼脂糖电泳和毛细管电泳法与可见-紫外光谱法鉴定结果一致。【结论】3种电泳方法各有优缺点,非变性凝胶电泳简便、廉价、有效,较适合普通实验室使用。
译 名:
Identification of Hapten-Carrier Protein Conjugate by Three Electrophoresis Methods
作 者:
LEI Hong-tao1, PANG Jie1,2, HE Li-ping3, YANG Jin-yi1, SUN Yuan-ming1, QIN Yi-lan1, LIANG Ming-biao1 (1Guangdong Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety/College of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642; 2College of Food Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002; 3Instrumental Analysis and Research Center of South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642)
关键词:
hapten-carrier protein bioconjugate; SDS-PAGE; nondenaturing agarose gel electrophoresis; capillary zone electrophoresis
摘 要:
ObjectiveTo establish a simple electrophoresis characterization method for hapten-carrier protein bioconjugate. Method SDS-PAGE, nondenaturing agarose gel electrophoresis and high performance capillary electrophoresis were employed and compared with spectrum method. Result The result showed that SDS-PAGE was not a sensitive candidate method to differentiate carrier protein from bioconjugate when both proteins have less molecular weight difference, but nondenaturing gel electrophoresis was a better alternative, which could discriminate the free carrier protein and bioconjugate protein with different net charge numbers. High performance capillary zone electrophoresis was another powerful approach for hapten-carrier protein bioconjugate characterization. The information obtained from three electrophoresis was in accordance with the one from ultraviolet- visible spectrum scanning. Conclusion Three electrophoresis methods had different advantages and disadvantages, cost-saving and simple nondenaturing electrophoresis seemed to have more availability in most laboratories.
相似文章
-
荧光光谱法在半抗原-载体蛋白偶联物鉴定中的应用 [张丽芳, 李伟岭, 江兆玲, 王米, 郑文丽, 薛飞群] 中国兽医杂志 2014,50 (7) 81-83