中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 沱江流域土壤侵蚀动态变化及驱动力分析 水土保持研究 2022,29 (2) 43-49+56
Position: Home > Articles > Analysis of Dynamic Changes and Driving Forces of Soil Erosion in Tuojiang River Basin Research of Soil and Water Conservation 2022,29 (2) 43-49+56

沱江流域土壤侵蚀动态变化及驱动力分析

作  者：
钟旭珍;张素;吴瑞娟;敬远兵;门雷雷;周婷
单  位：
内江师范学院地理与资源科学学院;中煤科工生态环境科技有限公司
关键词：
GIS;土壤侵蚀;RUSLE;地理探测器;沱江流域
摘  要：
为了解沱江流域土壤侵蚀的动态演变规律及驱动机制,以沱江流域为研究区,基于GIS和RS技术,运用RUSLE模型测评流域2000—2018年的土壤侵蚀,对其时空动态演变规律进行了探索分析,并结合海拔、坡度、植被覆盖度、地形地貌、土地、降雨、GDP、人口等影响因子,借助地理探测器对其土壤侵蚀进行了定量归因研究。结果表明:(1)沱江流域土壤侵蚀以微度侵蚀为主,主要分布于低矮的平原和坡耕地地区;2000—2018年,微度侵蚀等级比例随时间在逐渐增大,2018年相比2000年增加了7.03%,剧烈侵蚀等级比例随时间在逐渐减小,2018年相比2000年减小了2.00%。(2)以2010年为分界点,2000—2010年和2010—2018年土壤侵蚀等级微度的变化稳定率都大于75%,两个时间段内土壤侵蚀强度等级降低的范围均大于侵蚀等级升高的范围。(3)地理探测器结果表明,不同影响因子对土壤侵蚀的解释力具有差异性,解释力最强的为坡度,达到48.32%,因子间交互作用均能增强对土壤侵蚀的解释力,坡度与土地利用、坡度与降雨量的交互最为显著,交互作用解释力分别达到61.58%,52.32%,风险探测表明坡度大于35°,海拔大于1 500 m等起伏较大的山区是土壤侵蚀的高风险区,需重点治理。
译  名：
Analysis of Dynamic Changes and Driving Forces of Soil Erosion in Tuojiang River Basin
作  者：
ZHONG Xuzhen;ZHANG Su;WU Ruijuan;JING Yuanbing;MEN Leilei;ZHOU Ting;School of Geography and Resources Science, Neijiang Normal University;China Coal Science and Engineering Ecological Environment Technology Co., Ltd.;
关键词：
GIS;;soil erosion;;RUSLE;;geodetector;;Tuojiang River Basin
摘  要：
To understand the dynamic evolution and driving mechanism of soil erosion in the Tuojiang River Basin, based on GIS and RS technology, the RUSLE model was used to evaluate the soil erosion in the basin from 2000 to 2018, and its temporal and spatial dynamic evolution was analyzed, and geodetector was used to conduct quantitative attribution research on soil erosion through combining with altitude, slope, vegetation coverage, topography, land, rainfall, GDP, population and other influencing factors. The results showed that:(1) soil erosion in the Tuojiang River Basin was dominated by slight degree, mainly distributed in low slope farmland; from 2000 to 2018, the area of slight erosion increased gradually with time, in 2018, it increased by 7.03% compared to 2000, and the area of severe erosion decreased gradually with time, in 2018, it decreased by 2.00% compared with 2000;(2) taking 2010 as the demarcation point, it could be seen that the stability rates of the slight change of soil erosion grade in 2000—2010 and 2010—2018 were greater than 75%; in the two time periods, the range of soil erosion grade reduction was greater than the range of erosion grade increase;(3) the geodetector results showed that different influencing factors had different explanatory powers for soil erosion, and the strongest explanatory power was slope, reaching 48.32%; the interaction between factors could enhance the explanatory power of soil erosion, and the interaction between slope and land use, slope and rainfall was the most significant, and the explanatory power of the interaction reached 61.58% and 52.32%, respectively; risk detection showed that mountainous areas with steep slopes greater than 35° and elevations greater than 1 500 m were high-risk areas of soil erosion and needed the key management.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 12
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 1

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46