中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会
Agricultural Information Institute of CAAS China Association of Agricultural Science Societies
En
Ch
中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 主办

AI检索

订阅

返回顶部
当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 香蕉不同组织的基因组DNA制备方法的比较 分子植物育种 2017 (12) 5052-5059
Position: Home > Articles > Comparison of Genomic DNA Extraction Methods from Various Tissues of Banana Molecular Plant Breeding 2017 (12) 5052-5059

香蕉不同组织的基因组DNA制备方法的比较

作  者：
盛鸥;张玉娥;邓贵明;胡春华;杨乔松;李春雨;易干军
单  位：
广东省农业科学院果树研究所农业部南亚热带果树生物学与遗传资源利用重点实验室
关键词：
香蕉;基因组DNA提取;氯化苄;CTAB
摘  要：
本研究以香蕉的叶、假茎、根、果皮、果肉为材料,比较了CTAB常规法及其3种改良法、SDS法、SDS结合蛋白酶裂解法、改良尿素法、氯化苄法等方法提取基因组DNA的效果,以期筛选出通用性高、操作简便的基因组DNA制备方法。结果表明:氯化苄法不仅能够有效地从叶片、假茎、根系和果肉中提取到高质量的基因组DNA,也适合从果皮中提取少量DNA,其中提取液中添加600μL氯化苄的浓度处理效果最好;尽管CTAB常规法及其改良法能有效地从叶片中提取DNA,但对其他组织部位的提取效果较氯化苄法差;SDS法、SDS结合蛋白酶裂解法和改良尿素法的提取叶片DNA的效果较CTAB法差,也不能从根系和果皮、果肉中提取到高质量DNA。此外,PCR扩增试验结果表明,氯化苄法能满足后续的基于ITS的分子标记鉴定研究。
译  名：
Comparison of Genomic DNA Extraction Methods from Various Tissues of Banana
作  者：
Sheng Ou;Zhang Yu'e;Deng Guiming;Hu Chunhua;Yang Qiaosong;Li Chunyu;Yi Ganjun;Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture of China, Institute of Fruit Tree Research,Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences;
关键词：
Banana(Musa spp.);;Genomic DNA extraction;;Benzyl chloride;;CTAB
摘  要：
Abstrac t In order to select a simple and rapid protocol for high-throughput genomic DNA extraction from various tissues of banana(leaf, pseudostem, root, peel and pulp), the eight existing methods, i.e, traditional or modified CTAB methods, SDS or SDS-proteinase K method, modified Urea method and Benzyl Chloride method,have been used to compare quality and efficiency respectively. Results showed that, Benzyl Chloride method not only facilitated the extraction of high quality DNA from tissues of leaf, pseudostem, root, pulp, but also was suitable to extract a small amount of DNA from peel after using an addition of 600 μL benzyl chloride in extraction solution. For traditional or modified CTAB methods, they exhibited less effective than Benzyl Chloride method,although the CTAB methods also performed well in extracting leaf DNA. Besides, genomic DNA could not been extracted from tissues of root, peel and pulp if using the methods of SDS, SDS-proteinase K or modified Urea, and the DNA quality from leaf extracted by these 3 methods was worse than those extracted by CTAB methods. In addition, the DNA extracted by Benzyl Chloride method was proved to be suitable for the downstream application,such as in PCR amplification of ITS region used for identifying and classifying banana germplasm.

相似文章

导出引用
计量
文章访问数: 11
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊

友情链接Friendly link
农业信息研究所Agricultural information institute 农业智能知识服务平台Agricultural intelligent knowledge service platform 农业学术服务平台Agricultural Knowledge Service System 中国知网CNKI 维普网VIP 万方WANFANG DATA
联系我们Contact us

电话Tell：010-82109652-808

邮箱E-mail：agrijournal@caas.cn

服务Service
关于我们About us 意见建议Opinions and suggest
版权说明Copyright
单位：中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 中国农学会 © 2017中国农业科学院农业信息研究所 ICP备案号：京ICP备09089781号-46