当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 林业社会化服务供给对贫困农户林地投入产出影响分析 林业经济问题 2020 (2) 129-137
Position: Home > Articles > Influences of Forestry Socialized Service Supply on the Input-output Level of Farmers' Land with Different Poverty Levels Issues of Forestry Economics 2020 (2) 129-137

林业社会化服务供给对贫困农户林地投入产出影响分析

作  者:
孔凡斌;阮华;廖文梅
单  位:
浙江农林大学经济管理学院;江西财经大学经济学院;江西农业大学经济管理学院
关键词:
林业社会化服务;不同贫困程度;农户投入;林地产出
摘  要:
基于江西省700户用材林农户调查数据,采用回归模型定量分析林业社会化服务供给对不同贫困程度农户林地投入和产出的影响程度和影响方向,以验证林权配套改革中的社会化服务供给是否发挥应有的效果。结果表明:林木栽培技术服务对一般贫困农户林地投入和林地产出水平具有显著正向影响;金融服务对非贫困农户和重度贫困农户林地投入水平具有显著正向影响;病虫害防治等服务对非贫困农户和一般贫困农户林地投入有显著负向影响;林地面积对不同农户林地投入产出具有显著的负向影响;是否参加林地保险对重度贫困农户林地投入有显著正向影响;劳动力人数对非贫困农户林地投入有显著正向影响;家庭收入结构对不同农户林地投入产出具有显著正向影响;户主年龄对非贫困农户和一般贫困农户林地投入有显著正向影响。因此,提出针对贫困农户提供林业技术培训;加大对贫困农户林业金融扶贫力度;加大林业社会化服务体系建设的财政投入力度等对策建议。
译  名:
Influences of Forestry Socialized Service Supply on the Input-output Level of Farmers' Land with Different Poverty Levels
作  者:
KONG Fanbin;RUAN Hua;LIAO Wenmei;School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang A&F University;School of Economics,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics;School of Economics and Management,Jiangxi Agricultural University;
关键词:
forestry socialized service;;poor farmers;;input of farmers;;forestland output
摘  要:
⑴ Background——After the reform of collective forest right system and large number of rural labor force transfer,the management of forest land face great pressure.The input-output level and income of that have decreased,which affect the development of forest area and living in it.So it is really need to solve the problems.⑵ Methods——Based on the data of 700 surveyed households in 6 counties of Jiangxi province,this study used the multiply regression model to analyze the effect of forestry socialized service on farmers' input and output of forest land.In order to compare the differences of its effect on different poor farmers,the regression analysis was carried out for different groups of poor farmers.⑶ Results——According to the proportion of spending on food to the overall household expenditure,farmers are divided into non-poor households,general poor households and severe poor households.Through descriptive analyse of the characteristics of farmers,input-output level and forest land management,it can be seen that the input-output level of the non-poor is the highest,2 804.09 and 3 569.95 respectively,and that of the severe poor is the lowest,1 695.03 and 2 410.97 respectively.The proportion of them engaged in forestry insurance is higher,8% and 11% respectively.For non-poor households,finical services and services such as pest control have a significant impact on the input level of forest land,its coefficient are 0.424 and-0.434 respectively,while only finical services has a significant impact on the input level of forest land for serve poor households,its coefficient is 0.737,meanwhile forest cultivation technology service only has a significant impact on the input-output level of forest land for general poor households,its coefficient are 0.518 and 0.353 respectively,and market information has no impact on on the input-output level of forest land for all kind of households.Besides,the area of forest land and the main income have a significant impact on the input-output level of forest land for three kinds of households,their coefficient all are negative and positive respectively,the number of labors merely have a significant impact on the input-output level of forest land for the non-poor, its coefficient are 0.180 and 0.124 respectively,the age of the head of households have a significant impact on the input level of forest land for the non-poor and general poor,its coefficient all are positive.⑷ Conclusions and Discussions——Firstly,the training service of forest cultivation technology only improves the input and output level of forest land of poor farmers,but the positive effect on non-poor peasant households and seriously poor peasant households is not significant due to their low enthusiasm for investing in forestry.Secondly,the credit support of financial institutions has not brought significant growth to the general poor peasant households,which reflects that the low level of participation of peasant households in formal loans still exists.Thirdly,services such as pest and disease control have reduced the cost of forestation for non-poor farmers and poor farmers in general,which reflects the importance of large-scale services for forestland production and management.Therefore,it is recommended to strengthen the training of forestry technology for poor farmers, improve the technology application capacity of poor farmers; innovate the forestry finance poverty alleviation model, increase support for poor farmers;increase the level of financial investment guarantee,and accelerate the construction of forestry social service system.

相似文章

计量
文章访问数: 9
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊