当前位置: 首页 > 文章 > 夏季遮阳对‘红阳’猕猴桃净光合速率的影响及其与生理生态因子的关系 果树学报 2017,34 (9) 1144-1151
Position: Home > Articles > Impact of summer shading on net photosynthetic rate of Actinidia chinensis 'Hongyang' and its related eco-physiological factors Journal of Fruit Science 2017,34 (9) 1144-1151

夏季遮阳对‘红阳’猕猴桃净光合速率的影响及其与生理生态因子的关系

作  者:
陈延松;袁华玲;卫文渊;刘思芹;陈加伟;姚成林
单  位:
合肥师范学院生命科学学院
关键词:
‘红阳’猕猴桃;夏季遮阳;生理生态因子;通径分析;光合作用
摘  要:
【目的】探明夏季遮阳对‘红阳’猕猴桃叶片光合特性的影响。【方法】设置0%、35%和70%3种遮阳处理,利用CI-340(CID Inc.,USA)便携式光合仪测量‘红阳’猕猴桃的气体交换参数,分析‘红阳’猕猴桃净光合速率(P_n)的日变化规律及其与生理生态因子之间的关系。【结果】夏季‘红阳’猕猴桃叶片Pn日变化在0%和35%遮阳处理下为典型的"双峰"曲线,在70%遮阳处理下为单峰曲线;35%遮阳处理下‘红阳’猕猴桃P_n日最高值为14.715μmol·m~(-2)·s~(-1),日均值为7.889μmol·m~(-2)·s~(-1),明显高于0%和70%遮阳处理组。【结论】在夏季,适度遮阳可有效地提高‘红阳’猕猴桃叶片的P_n。但早晨和傍晚遮阳并不利于‘红阳’猕猴桃叶片进行光合作用。光合有效辐射和叶面温度是‘红阳’猕猴桃净光合速率(P_n)的主要限制因子,而蒸腾速率是主要决定因子。
译  名:
Impact of summer shading on net photosynthetic rate of Actinidia chinensis 'Hongyang' and its related eco-physiological factors
作  者:
CHEN Yansong;YUAN Hualing;WEI Wenyuan;LIU Siqin;CHEN Jiawei;YAO Chenglin;College of Life Sciences, Hefei Normal University;Anhui Runsheng Agricultural Development Co.Ltd.;
单  位:
College of Life Sciences, Hefei Normal University%Anhui Runsheng Agricultural Development Co.Ltd.
关键词:
Actinidia chinensis 'Hongyang';;Summer shading;;Eco-physiological factors;;Path analysis;;Photosynthesis
摘  要:
【Objective】The study explored the diurnal changes in photosynthetic parameters of Actinidia chinensis‘Hongyang'under different shading treatments in summer.【Methods】0%(control), 35% and70% shading levels were used in this study, and the treatments began on June 10, 2015. Gas exchange characteristics of the plants were detected on sunny days(July 13 to14 and August 3 to 4, 2015) from 6:00to 18:00 at 1.5 h intervals. Photosynthesis related parameters including Pn, transpiration rate(Tr), stomatal conductance(Gs), intercellular CO2concentration(Ci), leaf temperature(Tleaf) and environmental factors including photosynthetic active radiation(PAR), air temperature(ta), air CO2concentration(Ca), and air relative humidity(RH) were automatically measured and recorded with a portable photosynthesis system with an air flow rate of 0.3 L·min–1and an open system(CI-340, CID Inc., USA). Central portion of each leaf was used for photosynthesis measurement to ensure sample uniformity. Measurements were replicated 6times(n = 6) for each treatment.【Results】(1) A typical double-peak pattern of diurnal changes in Pnwith an obvious midday depression was recorded in the control and the 35% shading treatment. The value of the first peak of Pnoccurred at 9:00 and was the highest. In the control and under 35% shading treatment,this peak value was 11.198 and 14.715 μmol·m~(-2)·s~(-1), respectively, and the value of the second peak occurring at 15:00 was 7.817 and 8.980 μmol·m~(-2)·s~(-1), respectively. In contrast, a single-peak diurnal curveof Pnwas found in the 70% shading treatment, the peak value of which was 10.982 μmol·m~(-2)·s~(-1) appearing at 9:00. The daily average value of Pnwas 7.889, 6.058, and 3.921 μmol·m~(-2)·s~(-1) in the 35% shading treatment, the control and the 70% shading treatment, respectively. However, the value of PNwas significantly higher in the control than in the 35% and 70% shading treatments at 6:00 and 18:00.(2) The94.8% and 99.3% of the variations in Pncould be separately explained by 6 eco-physiological factors,such as PAR, Ca, Tr, Gs, Ci, and Tleafin the control and the 35% shading treatments, respectively. 97.3% of the variation in Pncould be explained by Ca, RH, Gsand Ciunder 70% shading treatment. Further, significant negative effects of PAR, Ci, and Tleafbut significant positive effects of Ca, Tr, and Gson Pnwere found in the control and under the 35% shading treatment. As for the 70% shading treatment, negative factors and the direct positive factors were Ci, RH and Ca, Gs, respectively. According to the decision coefficient,PAR, Gs, Ciand Tleafwere the four inhibitors and Caand Trwere the 2 determinants which affected the Pnof A. chinensis‘Hongyang'in the control. The inhibitors and the determinants were PAR, Tleafand Tr, Gsand Ciunder the 35% shading treatment, respectively, and were Ci, RH and Ca, Gsunder the 70% shading treatment, respectively.【Conclusion】In summer, there was an obvious midday depression of Pnin A. chinensis‘Hongyang', which was caused by stomatal limitation. The Pncould be effectively improved by35% shading treatment except in the early morning or at dusk. PAR and Tleafwere the major inhibitors affecting the Pnof A. chinensis‘Hongyang', while Trwas its main determinant. We suggest that, for the cultivation of the A. chinensis‘Hongyang', it is better to select an open region with a good air circulation, such as flat terrain or less slope gradient and southern side of hills, and to use moderate shading treatment in day time but avoiding shading in the early morning and at dusk during summer.

相似文章

计量
文章访问数: 14
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0

所属期刊

推荐期刊